Adams v. Duvall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Adams v. Duvall

92 S.E. 955, 20 Ga. App. 205, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 814

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 14, 1917·No. 8480·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

George, J.

1. This suit was brought in a justice’s court, upon a promissory note. The plea filed by the defendant set forth no legal defense, and was properly stricken upon demurrer. The judge of the superior court therefore did not err in overruling the petition for certiorari.

2. The motion to award damages, for bringing up the case for delay only, is meritorious, and statutory damages (Civil Code (1910), § 6213) are therefore assessed against the plaintiff in error.

Judgment affirmed, with damages.

Wade, G. J., and Luhe, J., concur. 8. 0. Creme, for plaintiff in error. McKinnon & Hulbert, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George, J.

1. This suit was brought in a justice’s court, upon a promissory note. The plea filed by the defendant set forth no legal defense, and was properly stricken upon demurrer. The judge of the superior court therefore did not err in overruling the petition for certiorari.

2. The motion to award damages, for bringing up the case for delay only, is meritorious, and statutory damages (Civil Code (1910), § 6213) are therefore assessed against the plaintiff in error.

Judgment affirmed, with damages.

Wade, G. J., and Luhe, J., concur. 8. 0. Creme, for plaintiff in error. McKinnon & Hulbert, contra.

Adams v. Duvall, 92 S.E. 955, 20 Ga. App. 205, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 814 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

92 S.E. 955 (Adams v. Duvall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related