Adams v. Duvall

92 S.E. 955, 20 Ga. App. 205, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 814
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 14, 1917
Docket8480
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 92 S.E. 955 (Adams v. Duvall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. Duvall, 92 S.E. 955, 20 Ga. App. 205, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 814 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

George, J.

1. This suit was brought in a justice’s court, upon a promissory note. The plea filed by the defendant set forth no legal defense, and was properly stricken upon demurrer. The judge of the superior court therefore did not err in overruling the petition for certiorari.

2. The motion to award damages, for bringing up the case for delay only, is meritorious, and statutory damages (Civil Code (1910), § 6213) are therefore assessed against the plaintiff in error.

Judgment affirmed, with damages.

Wade, G. J., and Luhe, J., concur. 8. 0. Creme, for plaintiff in error. McKinnon & Hulbert, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murrow v. Walden
120 S.E. 545 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 S.E. 955, 20 Ga. App. 205, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-duvall-gactapp-1917.