Adams v. Drexel
This text of 17 Ind. 87 (Adams v. Drexel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellees, who were the plaintiffs, sued the appellants, who were the defendants, upon two promissory notes, one for the payment of $173, and the other for $215. The notes were payable to W. W. & H. Smith, and by them indorsed to the plaintiffs. The record shows that process was duly served on the defendants, and [88]*88having failed to appear, they were defaulted, and judgment by default regularly entered against them. No motion to set aside the default appears to have been made in the lower Court; hence, the errors assigned in this Court are not available.
The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 Ind. 87, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-drexel-ind-1861.