Adams v. Council, Baradel, Kosmerl & Nolan, P.A.
This text of 4 F. App'x 209 (Adams v. Council, Baradel, Kosmerl & Nolan, P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John A. Adams appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders (1) determining that his debt of attorney’s fees were nondischargeable in his bankruptcy case, and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the lower courts’ opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Adams v. Council Baradel, 254 B.R. 857 (D.Md.2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 F. App'x 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-council-baradel-kosmerl-nolan-pa-ca4-2001.