Adams v. Council, Baradel, Kosmerl & Nolan, P.A.

4 F. App'x 209
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2001·No. 00-2427·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John A. Adams appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders (1) determining that his debt of attorney’s fees were nondischargeable in his bankruptcy case, and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the lower courts’ opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Adams v. Council Baradel, 254 B.R. 857 (D.Md.2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. Council, Baradel, Kosmerl & Nolan, P.A., 4 F. App'x 209 (4th Cir. 2001).

4 F. App'x 209 (Adams v. Council, Baradel, Kosmerl & Nolan, P.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related