Adams v. Commissioner of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Adams v. Commissioner of Correction

23 A.3d 725, 301 Conn. 930, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 303

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 30, 2011·No. SC 18810·Published

Opinion

The respondent’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 128 Conn. App. 389 (AC 31388), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the state deprived the petitioner of a fair trial by failing [931]*931to disclose the victim’s plea agreement or to correct misleading testimony?”

Decided June 30, 2011 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18810. Robert J. Scheinblum, senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Damon A. R. Kirschbaum, special public defender, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The respondent’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 128 Conn. App. 389 (AC 31388), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the state deprived the petitioner of a fair trial by failing [931]*931to disclose the victim’s plea agreement or to correct misleading testimony?”

Decided June 30, 2011 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18810. Robert J. Scheinblum, senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Damon A. R. Kirschbaum, special public defender, in opposition.

Adams v. Commissioner of Correction, 23 A.3d 725, 301 Conn. 930, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 303 (Colo. 2011).

Pincite

23 A.3d 725 (Adams v. Commissioner of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related