Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Adams v. Commissioner of Correction

Adams v. Commissioner of Correction

23 A.3d 725, 301 Conn. 930, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 303
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 30, 2011
DocketSC 18810
StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.3d 725 (Adams v. Commissioner of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. Commissioner of Correction, 23 A.3d 725, 301 Conn. 930, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 303 (Colo. 2011).

Opinion

The respondent’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 128 Conn. App. 389 (AC 31388), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the state deprived the petitioner of a fair trial by failing [931]*931to disclose the victim’s plea agreement or to correct misleading testimony?”
Decided June 30, 2011 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18810. Robert J. Scheinblum, senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Damon A. R. Kirschbaum, special public defender, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. Commissioner of Correction
17 A.3d 479 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A.3d 725, 301 Conn. 930, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-commissioner-of-correction-conn-2011.