Adams v. Commercial Bark

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Adams v. Commercial Bark

88 S.E. 912, 18 Ga. App. 138, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 174

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 19, 1916

Docket6930

StatusPublished

This text of 88 S.E. 912 (Adams v. Commercial Bark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. Commercial Bark, 88 S.E. 912, 18 Ga. App. 138, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 174 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. When considered in the light of the entire charge and of the evidence introduced, and of the qualifying notes of the trial judge, the. excerpts from the charge complained of contain no reversible error.

2. No material error appears in the admission of the testimony objected to by the plaintiff, as set forth in the motion for a new trial.

3. There was evidence to support the finding of the jury, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, J.

1. When considered in the light of the entire charge and of the evidence introduced, and of the qualifying notes of the trial judge, the. excerpts from the charge complained of contain no reversible error.

2. No material error appears in the admission of the testimony objected to by the plaintiff, as set forth in the motion for a new trial.

3. There was evidence to support the finding of the jury, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 S.E. 912, 18 Ga. App. 138, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-commercial-bark-gactapp-1916.