Adams v. Colvin

Fourth Circuit

Adams v. Colvin

611 F. App'x 150

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 5, 2015·No. No. 14-1555·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sharon Radford Adams appeals the district court’s orders denying her initial petition to proceed in forma pauperis and upholding the Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits [151] and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Adams v. Colvin, No. 2:13-cv-00019-FDW-DSC, 2014 WL 1713775 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 26, 2013 & May 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sharon Radford Adams appeals the district court’s orders denying her initial petition to proceed in forma pauperis and upholding the Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits [151] and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Adams v. Colvin, No. 2:13-cv-00019-FDW-DSC, 2014 WL 1713775 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 26, 2013 & May 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Adams v. Colvin, 611 F. App'x 150 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

611 F. App'x 150 (Adams v. Colvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.