Adams v. Coker
85 Miss. 222
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The court below erred in estimating the commissions of the treasurer on the basis of the fiscal year. They should have been estimated on the basis of the political year, from January to January. It is clear from the testimony that there was no willfulness on the part of the treasurer in not making his report, and, on the whole record, we do not think the penalty recoverable.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adams v. Coker, 85 Miss. 222 (Mich. 1904).
85 Miss. 222 (Adams v. Coker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. Adams
50 So. 568 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1909)