Adams v. Clark
This text of 64 Ga. 648 (Adams v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The suit in the justice court was for twenty-five dollars, on a note for the hire of a horse for a year for farm work. The defense was that the horse was worthless, and could not and did not do the work, but broke down and died after some three weeks of very inefficient work.
On the trial before the jury, after a charge by the justice of the peace, the jury found for defendant, and the plaintiffs carried the case to the superior court by certiorari on the ground that the justice of the peace charged the jury at all, and that the verdict is without evidence and against law. The certiorari was dismissed and the judgment affirmed, and error is assigned here therefor.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 Ga. 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-clark-ga-1880.