Adams v. City of New York

36 A.D.3d 465, 825 N.Y.S.2d 914
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 11, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered September 2, 2005, which denied defendant Housing Authority’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff filed a note of issue in December 2004. Three months later, the court ordered plaintiff to serve within 30 days a supplemental bill of particulars with respect to notice of the defective condition at issue, extending the Housing Authority’s time to move for summary judgment until 45 days after receipt of the supplemental bill. The Housing Authority neither moved for summary judgment within the allotted time nor offered good cause for failure to do so, nor requested clarification of the court’s directive, which it now claims was unclear (see Brill v City of New York, 2 NY3d 648 [2004]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Mazzarelli, Andrias, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. City of New York, 36 A.D.3d 465, 825 N.Y.S.2d 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

36 A.D.3d 465 (Adams v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Giandana v. Providence Rest Nursing Home
38 A.D.3d 295 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)