Adams v. City of New York
This text of 81 F. App'x 750 (Adams v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of said district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.
Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from the grant of a Rule 12(c) judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendants City of New York and other unnamed police officials, and the grant of a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of claims against defendant Verizon in the district court of the Southern District of New York (Thomas P. Griesa, District Judge). We have carefully considered all of appellants’ arguments and find them to be without merit.
For the reasons set forth above, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 F. App'x 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-city-of-new-york-ca2-2003.