Adams v. Chimes District of Columbia, Inc.
This text of Adams v. Chimes District of Columbia, Inc. (Adams v. Chimes District of Columbia, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
) TERRANCE ADAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-0726 (RJL) ) CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) -------------------------------- )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
June <.y~ On May 11,2011, Chimes District of Columbia, Inc., by counsel, filed a motion to
dismiss the complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On May 23,
2011, the Court issued an Order which, among other things, advised plaintiff of his obligation to
file an opposition or other response to the motion. Further, the Order expressly warned plaintiff
that, ifhe failed to file his opposition by June 13,2011, the Court would treat the motion as
conceded. The Clerk of Court mailed a copy of the Order to plaintiff at his address of record. To
date, plaintiff neither has notified the Clerk of a change of address, has filed an opposition, nor
requested additional time to file an opposition. Accordingly, the Court will grant defendant's
motion and dismiss this action. An Order is issued separately.
United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Adams v. Chimes District of Columbia, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-chimes-district-of-columbia-inc-dcd-2011.