Home/Supreme Court/Adams v. Calhoun Cnty.

Adams v. Calhoun Cnty.

140 S. Ct. 1246, 206 L. Ed. 2d 173
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 24, 2020
DocketNo. 19-7200
StatusPublished

This text of 140 S. Ct. 1246 (Adams v. Calhoun Cnty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. Calhoun Cnty., 140 S. Ct. 1246, 206 L. Ed. 2d 173 (U.S. 2020).

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals , 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 S. Ct. 1246, 206 L. Ed. 2d 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-calhoun-cnty-scotus-2020.