Adams v. Bushey

60 N.H. 290
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1880
StatusPublished

This text of 60 N.H. 290 (Adams v. Bushey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. Bushey, 60 N.H. 290 (N.H. 1880).

Opinion

Clark, J.

The fact that the referee, after the hearing was closed, in the absence of the parties, examined the house and made measurements, was not, as a matter of law, cause for setting aside the report; and the court at the trial term has found, as a matter of fact, that the fairness of the trial was not affected by the second view, and that the plaintiff suffered no injustice therefrom. Straw v. Truesdale, 59 N. H. 109; George v. Fellows, post. In the remark made by the defendant to the referee, “ that she felt anxious about the case,” we fail to discover any intention to influence the referee, or anything that could affect his decision. To set aside a report without cause after a fair trial would do injustice to both parties.

Exceptions overruled.

Doe, C. J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Straw v. Truesdale
59 N.H. 109 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 N.H. 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-bushey-nh-1880.