Adams v. Brown

Opinion

UNITED STATES CO URT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAR 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK In re: BRANDON ADAMS. No. 24-936 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ____________________________ D.C. No. 2:23-cv-01923-CDS-MDC District of Nevada, BRANDON ADAMS, Las Vegas

ORDER Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS,

Respondent,

ELIZABETH BROWN; RORY WUNSCH,

Real Parties in Interest.

Before: FRIEDLAND, VANDYKE, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2021) (“To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.”); Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition for a writ of mandamus, as supplemented, is denied. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DENIED.