Adams v. Bean
This text of Adams v. Bean (Adams v. Bean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Bryan Adams, Case No.: 2:23-cv-01930-JAD-BNW
4 Petitioner Order Granting Motion for 5 v. Appointment of Counsel
6 Jeremy Bean, et al., [ECF No. 3]
7 Respondents
8 9 Pro se Petitioner Bryan Adams filed this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas 10 corpus,1 challenging his 2020 judgment of conviction after a guilty plea to attempted sexual 11 assault of a minor under fourteen years of age. Adams also moves for appointment of counsel.2 12 I find that the appointment of counsel is in the interests of justice, so I provisionally appoint the 13 Federal Public Defender to represent Adams in this case. 14 Discussion 15 Adams is currently serving a lengthy sentence of 8 to 20 years. His petition raises 16 relatively complex issues, including numerous claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and 17 allegations that Adams did not knowingly enter into a guilty plea agreement. Adams is also 18 financially eligible for appointment of counsel.3 Although he has paid the filing fee, he lacks the 19 funds to afford counsel.4 20 21 1 ECF No. 1-1. 22 2 ECF No. 3. 23 3 18 U.S.C. § 3006A. 4 ECF Nos. 3, 5. 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 2 1. Petitioner’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel [ECF No. 3] is GRANTED. 3 2. The Federal Public Defender is provisionally appointed as counsel and will have 4 until February 10, 2024, to undertake direct representation of petitioner or to 5 indicate the office’s inability to represent him in these proceedings. If the Federal Public Defender is unable to represent petitioner, the court will appoint alternate 6 counsel. The counsel appointed will represent petitioner in all federal proceedings 7 related to this matter, including any appeals or certiorari proceedings, unless allowed 8 to withdraw. A deadline for the filing of an amended petition or seeking other relief 9 will be set after counsel has entered an appearance, likely 90 days from entry of the 10 formal order of appointment. 11 3. Any deadline established or deadline extension will not signify any implied finding of 12 a basis for tolling during the time period established. Petitioner at all times remains responsible for calculating the running of the federal limitation period and timely 13 presenting claims. By setting a deadline to amend the petition or granting any 14 extension thereof, I make no finding or representation that the petition, any 15 amendments thereto, or any claims contained therein are not subject to dismissal as 16 untimely.5 17 4. So that the respondents may be electronically served with any papers filed through 18 counsel, the Clerk of Court is directed to ADD state attorney general Aaron D. 19 Ford as counsel for respondents and make informal electronic service of this order upon respondents by directing a notice of electronic filing to him. Respondents’ 20 counsel must enter a notice of appearance within 21 days of entry of this order, 21 but no further response will be required from respondents until further order of the 22 Court. 23
5 See Sossa v. Diaz, 729 F.3d 1225, 1235 (9th Cir. 2013). 5. The Clerk of Court is further directed to SEND a copy of this order to the pro se 2 petitioner, the Nevada Attorney General, the Federal Public Defender, and the CJA 3 Coordinator for this division, and also to provide the Federal Public Defender with 4 copies of all prior filings in this case by regenerating notices of electronic filing or 5 through such other means as is expedient for the clerk.
USS. District hadge Jennif A/Dorsey 7 Dated: January 9, 2024 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Adams v. Bean, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-bean-nvd-2024.