Adams v. Beadle
This text of 43 Iowa 579 (Adams v. Beadle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The abstract states that the cause “ was tried and submitted to the court on the following testimony.” Following this statement is an abstract of the testimony of 'two witnesses. The transcript shows that the testimony of six witnesses was taken in the case. The appellee moves to affirm, on the ground that the abstract does not state that it is an abstract of the testimony of all of the witnesses, and on the ground that it is in fact not an abstract of the testimony ’of all the witnesses.
In Britton v. The Cen. R. Co. et al., 39 Iowa, 390, it was held that where a case was tried below by the first method, and is triable de novo in the Supreme Court, the court must be satisfied that it has an abstract of all the evidence. As we 'have not in the present case an abstract of all the evidence, it must be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 Iowa 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-beadle-iowa-1876.