Adams v. Bankers' Life Ass'n
This text of 33 P. 192 (Adams v. Bankers' Life Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case we have heretofore sustained a motion striking from the record a large portion thereof. The appeal is from the judgment. All that is now before us is the judgment-roll, and a paper which is claimed to be a bill of exceptions. Appellant has filed no brief, and made no argument, and in no way suggests any error apparent upon tha [223]*223judgment-roll. Our examination does not disclose any error. (Territory v. Stanton, 8 Mont. 157.) The bill of exceptions is a mere skeleton, containing notes to the effect, “Here insert,” but the matter to be inserted is not inserted, nor is it in the record by reference. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 P. 192, 13 Mont. 222, 1893 Mont. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-bankers-life-assn-mont-1893.