Adams v. Anderson
4 H. & J. 558
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court. It is objected that the agreement in this case is a special verbal promise to answer for the default of another person, and void under the statute of frauds. In the opinion of the [560]*560court it is clearly,not such an undertaking, but is a palpa» ble cheat and fraud on the part of the appellant, for which the appellee is entitled to damages.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adams v. Anderson, 4 H. & J. 558 (Md. 1819).
4 H. & J. 558 (Adams v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Northwest Real Estate Co. v. Serio
144 A. 245 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1929)
Purdum v. Edwards
141 A. 550 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1928)