Adams v. Adams

514 P.2d 536, 30 Utah 2d 121, 1973 Utah LEXIS 662
Utah Supreme Court·Decided September 24, 1973·No. No. 12801·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to a hearing on an order to show cause issued in a divorce proceeding the defendant (appellant) was found guilty of contempt for violating an order with respect to contacting his minor child. However, no written findings of fact, conclusions of law or judgment thereon were ever entered. We have heretofore ruled that this was a prerequisite to the enforcement of a judgment and commitment for contempt. See Brown v. Cook, 123 Utah 505, 260 P.2d 544 (1953). That not having been done here, it is necessary that the order of contempt be vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. Adams, 514 P.2d 536, 30 Utah 2d 121, 1973 Utah LEXIS 662 (Utah 1973).

514 P.2d 536 (Adams v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salzetti v. Backman
638 P.2d 543 (Utah Supreme Court, 1981)