Adams v. Adams

Utah Supreme Court

Adams v. Adams

514 P.2d 536, 30 Utah 2d 121, 1973 Utah LEXIS 662

CourtUtah Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 24, 1973

DocketNo. 12801

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 514 P.2d 536 (Adams v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. Adams, 514 P.2d 536, 30 Utah 2d 121, 1973 Utah LEXIS 662 (Utah 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to a hearing on an order to show cause issued in a divorce proceeding the defendant (appellant) was found guilty of contempt for violating an order with respect to contacting his minor child. However, no written findings of fact, conclusions of law or judgment thereon were ever entered. We have heretofore ruled that this was a prerequisite to the enforcement of a judgment and commitment for contempt. See Brown v. Cook, 123 Utah 505, 260 P.2d 544 (1953). That not having been done here, it is necessary that the order of contempt be vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to a hearing on an order to show cause issued in a divorce proceeding the defendant (appellant) was found guilty of contempt for violating an order with respect to contacting his minor child. However, no written findings of fact, conclusions of law or judgment thereon were ever entered. We have heretofore ruled that this was a prerequisite to the enforcement of a judgment and commitment for contempt. See Brown v. Cook, 123 Utah 505, 260 P.2d 544 (1953). That not having been done here, it is necessary that the order of contempt be vacated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

514 P.2d 536, 30 Utah 2d 121, 1973 Utah LEXIS 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-adams-utah-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack