Adams v. Adams

278 S.W. 1114
Texas Supreme Court·Decided October 24, 1923·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We do not think the Court of Civil Appeals intended to hold that there was error in excluding the testimony of Elmo Willard, set out in bill of exceptions No. 17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. Adams, 278 S.W. 1114 (Tex. 1923).

278 S.W. 1114 (Adams v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.