Adams v. Adams

Supreme Court of Florida

Adams v. Adams

187 So. 382, 136 Fla. 729, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1597

DecidedMarch 17, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 187 So. 382 (Adams v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. Adams, 187 So. 382, 136 Fla. 729, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1597 (Fla. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and oral argument of counsel, the Court finds no- error in the record and the order appealed from is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., concurs in the opinion and judgment. Justices Buford and Ti-iomas, not participating as authorized by Section 4687 Compiled General Laws of 1927 and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

— This cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and oral argument of counsel, the Court finds no- error in the record and the order appealed from is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., concurs in the opinion and judgment. Justices Buford and Ti-iomas, not participating as authorized by Section 4687 Compiled General Laws of 1927 and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 So. 382, 136 Fla. 729, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-adams-fla-1939.