Adams v. Adams

Supreme Court of Florida

Adams v. Adams

187 So. 382, 136 Fla. 729, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1597

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Adams v. Adams. Read the opinion of the Court — 147 Fla. 267 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 17, 1939·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and oral argument of counsel, the Court finds no- error in the record and the order appealed from is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., concurs in the opinion and judgment. Justices Buford and Ti-iomas, not participating as authorized by Section 4687 Compiled General Laws of 1927 and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

— This cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and oral argument of counsel, the Court finds no- error in the record and the order appealed from is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., concurs in the opinion and judgment. Justices Buford and Ti-iomas, not participating as authorized by Section 4687 Compiled General Laws of 1927 and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Adams v. Adams, 187 So. 382, 136 Fla. 729, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1597 (Fla. 1939).

Pincite

187 So. 382 (Adams v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.