Adams v. Adams

Connecticut Superior Court

Adams v. Adams

4 Conn. Super. Ct. 154

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedSeptember 22, 1936

DocketFile No. 50020

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Conn. Super. Ct. 154 (Adams v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. Adams, 4 Conn. Super. Ct. 154 (Colo. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

The case of Davis vs. Davis, 119 Conn. 194, cited to sustain the plaintiff's contention, is not in point. That case turned upon the existence or non-existence of an intent to be married. The facts in that case showed conclusively that no such intent existed.

That is not the situation here. The parties were infatuated with each other, talked over the idea of getting married beforehand, and deliberately decided on the step which they subsequently carried out. It is a clear case of married in haste, repent at leisure.

The complaint is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The case of Davis vs. Davis, 119 Conn. 194, cited to sustain the plaintiff's contention, is not in point. That case turned upon the existence or non-existence of an intent to be married. The facts in that case showed conclusively that no such intent existed.

That is not the situation here. The parties were infatuated with each other, talked over the idea of getting married beforehand, and deliberately decided on the step which they subsequently carried out. It is a clear case of married in haste, repent at leisure.

The complaint is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Conn. Super. Ct. 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-adams-connsuperct-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack