Adams, Terry V. v. East Tennessee Personal Care Service, LLC

2019 TN WC 117
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedAugust 1, 2019
Docket2019-03-0154
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 TN WC 117 (Adams, Terry V. v. East Tennessee Personal Care Service, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams, Terry V. v. East Tennessee Personal Care Service, LLC, 2019 TN WC 117 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2019).

Opinion

FILED Aug 01, 2019 11:54 AM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT KNOXVILLE TERRY V. ADAMS, ) Docket No. 2019-03-0154 Employee, ) V. ) EAST TENNESSEE PERSONAL ) CARE SERVICE, LLC, ) State File No. 27353-2018 Employer, ) And ) ACCIDENT FUND GENERAL ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) Judge Pamela B. Johnson Carrier. ) )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING MEDICAL BENEFITS

This case came before the Court for an Expedited Hearing on July 10, 2019. The Court must decide whether Ms. Adams came forward with sufficient evidence demonstrating that she is entitled to additional benefits. For the reasons below, the Court holds Ms. Adams is entitled to ongoing medical benefits.

History of Claim

Ms. Adams worked as a personal aide for East Tennessee Personal Care Service (ETPCS).' Her duties involved assisting clients with transportation and activities of daily living. On March 5, 2018, another vehicle struck Ms. Adams’s personal vehicle while transporting an ETPCS client. Ms. Adams immediately called the police and reported the accident to her supervisor. After the police completed its report, Ms. Adams transported her client and herself to the emergency room.

Although the police report indicated the parties were not injured, Ms. Adams emailed her supervisor on the evening of the accident and stated, “The impact was so

'Two months after Ms. Adams’s injury, ETPCS joined Associated Home Care, an Amedisys company. hard, I knew I needed to get checked out due to having thoracic stents in my body.”” She provided her supervisor the hospital discharge paperwork and the traffic accident report number. Ms. Adams completed a Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security Owner/Driver Report and noted that the accident resulted in injuries. She additionally provided a written statement on March 23 and advised, “I had emergency medical care, due to a pre-existing medical problem, but I may need additional medical care.” In her statement, she requested that “the correct person who handles Workers’ Compensation contact me as soon as possible.”

ETPCS prepared a First Report of Work Injury on April 16 and noted, “INJURED WORKER STATES CHEST, HEAD AND LOWER LEG PAIN.” (Emphasis in original). That same day, the owner of ETPCS told Ms. Adams that the only provider she could see was Farragut Family, but he did not give her an appointment date or any documentation from workers’ compensation. In July, she contacted ETPCS’s carrier and spoke to the adjuster, who told her the claim was “opened and closed.” On July 31, Ms. Adams received a note with a telephone number for Farragut Family. However, when she called to schedule an appointment, Farragut Family said that it needed her employer’s authorization.

She ultimately received authorization and saw Dr. Gerald Russell at Farragut Family on August 2. She reported neck and mid-back pain radiating down her left arm after the March car accident. Dr. Russell ordered a cervical and thoracic MRI and assigned restrictions. On August 30, Dr. Russell reviewed the MRI, which showed degenerative disc disease in her cervical spine, and he suggested physical therapy and “possible physiatry referral.”

Ms. Adams filed her Petition for Benefit Determination on February 5, 2019, seeking additional medical treatment. At the Expedited Hearing, she asserted that ETPCS unreasonably delayed authorization of her initial treatment and payment of her medical bills. Ms. Adams acknowledged that she received a panel of physiatrists in October 2018 and selected a physician.

ETCPS denied it unreasonably delayed Ms. Adams’s treatment or payment of related bills. It asserted Ms. Adams did not initially request treatment, and the police report noted no injuries. It also introduced its carrier’s claim payment report demonstrating payment of benefits to or on Ms. Adams’s behalf. Specifically, the report indicated it paid the ER physician’s March 5, 2018 charges on May 10, 2018, and the corresponding March 5, 2018 hospital bill on July 1, 2019. It argued the bill was

* Ms. Adams testified she suffered from a preexisting aortic aneurysm and needed medical treatment immediately. improperly sent to Ms. Adams’s automobile insurer, who declined to pay the hospital charges. ETCPS further noted it paid Ms. Adams’s mileage.

At the conclusion of the hearing, ETPCS confirmed its willingness to provide additional treatment with Dr. Russell and a panel-selected physiatrist for Ms. Adams’s work-related injuries. However, it argued other than continued authorized, causally- related medical care for Ms. Adams’s injuries, no other benefits were due.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

To prevail at an Expedited Hearing, Ms. Adams must show she would likely prevail at a hearing on the merits that she is entitled to additional benefits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2018).

It became clear to the Court during the hearing that Ms. Adams filed the Petition for Benefit Determination because she believed ETCPS neglected her. She testified she took immediate action to ensure her client received prompt medical attention. She contacted her supervisor from the scene of the accident to report the accident, and the same day she sent the traffic accident report number and discharge papers. In contrast, she said ETCPS showed little concern for her well-being. She testified it did not immediately offer her treatment or pay her emergency room care.

ETCPS argued that the police report noted no injuries, and Ms. Adams did not ask for treatment. However, the evidence showed Ms. Adams requested treatment as of March 23, but ETCPS did not provide it until August 2.

The Court finds Ms. Adams a credible employee who placed her client’s needs above her own. While Ms. Adams ensured her client was evaluated and treated if necessary, ETCPS did not extend the same courtesy to her. ETCPS eventually provided authorized medical treatment and paid her emergency room bills and mileage, but the delay caused discord between the parties and led to litigation.

The Workers’ Compensation Law requires an employer to provide an injured employee with medical treatment made reasonably necessary by a work accident. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204. To do so, following notice of injury and request for medical care, the employer must provide the injured employee with a panel of physicians within three business days. Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0800-02-01-.06(1). Additionally, medical bills must be paid within thirty calendar days of receipt of a properly submitted and complete bill. Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0800-02-17-.10(7) (2018). Failure to timely provide a panel of physicians and medical treatment exposes the employer to penalties under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-118. The Court finds ETCPS failed to timely provide Ms. Adams medical treatment and to timely pay her medical bills. Ms. Adams gave ETCPS notice and requested treatment by March 23, 2018, but ETCPS did not authorize it until shortly after July 31, 2018—a four-month delay. ETCPS further did not pay Ms. Adams’s March 5, 2018 emergency room bills until July 1, 2019 — an almost fifteen-month delay. Accordingly, the Court refers this case to the Compliance Unit for investigation and assessment of penalties under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-118 and Tennessee Compilation Rules and Regulations 0800-02-01 et seq. Further, the Court holds Ms. Adams is entitled to ongoing medical treatment under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-204
Tennessee § 50-6-204
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 TN WC 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-terry-v-v-east-tennessee-personal-care-service-llc-tennworkcompcl-2019.