Adams, Terrill Carl

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 2, 2025
DocketWR-93,753-01
StatusPublished

This text of Adams, Terrill Carl (Adams, Terrill Carl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams, Terrill Carl, (Tex. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-93,753-01

EX PARTE TERRILL CARL ADAMS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 14-2102-CR-A-A IN THE 2ND 25TH DISTRICT COURT GUADALUPE COUNTY

Per curiam. SCHENCK, P.J., and YEARY, J., dissented.

OPINION

Applicant was convicted of burglary of a habitation (count one) and aggravated robbery

(count three). A prior conviction from California was used to raise the minimum punishment for

these offenses from five years to fifteen years. Applicant was sentenced to fifteen years’

imprisonment on count one, and twenty years’ imprisonment on count three. The Fourth Court of

Appeals vacated his conviction in part, and affirmed his conviction in part.1 Adams v. State, No. 04-

15-00415-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 4, 2016) (not designated for publication). Applicant

filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk

1 Applicant was also convicted of burglary of a habitation (count two). The Court of Appeals vacated the judgment on count two on double jeopardy grounds. 2

forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective by failing to object

to a non-final conviction being used to enhance the punishment range.

Relief is granted. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). The record reflects that

trial counsel’s performance was deficient and that Applicant was prejudiced. The sentence in cause

number 14-2102-CR-A in the 2nd 25th District Court of Guadalupe County is set aside, and

Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Guadalupe County for a new punishment

hearing. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within ten days from the date of this

Court’s mandate.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: April 2, 2025 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Adams, Terrill Carl, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-terrill-carl-texcrimapp-2025.