Adams, T. v. Hon. Beirne
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
TIMOTHY JAY ADAMS, : No. 12 MM 2021 :
Petitioner : : :
v. : : :
HONORABLE MAUREEN T. BEIRNE, P.J., : AND DISTRICT ATTORNEY, : :
Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2021, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED. The Petition for Writ of Mandamus, the “Motion for Immediate
Release,” the “Motion to Amend,” the “Motion to Supplement Record,” and the “Motion
for Appointment of Counsel” are DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the
name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adams, T. v. Hon. Beirne (Adams, T. v. Hon. Beirne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.