Adams, T. v. Hon. Beirne
This text of Adams, T. v. Hon. Beirne (Adams, T. v. Hon. Beirne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
TIMOTHY JAY ADAMS, : No. 12 MM 2021 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : HONORABLE MAUREEN T. BEIRNE, P.J., : AND DISTRICT ATTORNEY, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2021, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED. The Petition for Writ of Mandamus, the “Motion for Immediate
Release,” the “Motion to Amend,” the “Motion to Supplement Record,” and the “Motion
for Appointment of Counsel” are DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the
name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Adams, T. v. Hon. Beirne, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-t-v-hon-beirne-pa-2021.