Adams, T. v. Hon. Beirne

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 23, 2021·No. 12 MM 2021·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

TIMOTHY JAY ADAMS, : No. 12 MM 2021 :

Petitioner : : :

v. : : :

HONORABLE MAUREEN T. BEIRNE, P.J., : AND DISTRICT ATTORNEY, : :

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2021, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED. The Petition for Writ of Mandamus, the “Motion for Immediate

Release,” the “Motion to Amend,” the “Motion to Supplement Record,” and the “Motion

for Appointment of Counsel” are DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the

name of the jurist from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams, T. v. Hon. Beirne, (Pa. 2021).

Adams, T. v. Hon. Beirne (Adams, T. v. Hon. Beirne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.