Adams Screenprint LLC v. Washington County, Tc-Md 081212b (or.tax 4-30-2009)
This text of Adams Screenprint LLC v. Washington County, Tc-Md 081212b (or.tax 4-30-2009) (Adams Screenprint LLC v. Washington County, Tc-Md 081212b (or.tax 4-30-2009)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At issue is $1,180.03 in penalties imposed for not timely filing personal property returns for the 2006-07 and 2007-08 tax years. The account involved is identified as P2155970. Plaintiff seeks cancellation of those penalties.
Defendant discovered the existence of Plaintiff and its taxable personal property in 2008. Defendant then proceeded pursuant to ORS
ORS
"After August 1, a taxpayer who files a return to which this section applies or who fails to file a return shall be subject to a penalty equal to 50 percent of the tax attributable to the taxable personal property of the taxpayer."
Plaintiff admittedly did not file its return before August 1 of each tax year. Pursuant to the statute, it is responsible for a 50 percent penalty. Plaintiff claims, however, it should be excused from the penalty because of circumstances beyond its immediate control.
ORS
ORS
"`Good and sufficient cause':
*Page 3"(A) Means an extraordinary circumstance that is beyond the control of the taxpayer, or the taxpayer's agent or representative, and that causes the taxpayer, agent or representative to fail to pursue the statutory right of appeal; and
"(B) Does not include inadvertence, oversight, lack of knowledge, hardship or reliance on misleading information provided by any person except an authorized tax official providing the relevant misleading information."
In this case, the failure to file is rooted in the admission that Plaintiff was unaware of the statutory requirement. It is immaterial that a personal property return form was not received in the mail. That specifically does not constitute a valid reason to compromise the statutory penalty. ORS
IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the appeal is denied.
Dated this ___ day of April 2009.
If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the RegularDivision of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street,Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 StateStreet, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of theDecision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed. This document was signed by Magistrate Jeffrey S. Mattson on April 30,2009. The Court filed and entered this document on April 30, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Adams Screenprint LLC v. Washington County, Tc-Md 081212b (or.tax 4-30-2009), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-screenprint-llc-v-washington-county-tc-md-081212b-ortax-ortc-2009.