Adams Express Co. v. McDonough
This text of 6 Ohio C.C. 539 (Adams Express Co. v. McDonough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
McDonough, the plaintiff below, at the request of Kearns, delivered to the Adams Express Co. in this city, two pieces of marble, to be duly transmitted by such company, C. O. D., [540]*540to Kearns, at Mt. Sterling, Ky. Both were destroyed while being so transported, and Kearns refused to receive or pay for them, and McDonough brought his action to recover the damages sustained by him, by the failure of the defendant to carry them safely.
The only question presented is, whether he is entitled to maintain the-action. The trial judge refused to charge the jury as requested by defendant’s counsel, that he was not. We think the action of the court was right. The title to the property did not pass to Kearns on the delivery to the carrier, but such title, and the jus disponendi, remained in Mc-Donough until the goods should be received by Kearns from the carrier, and paid for by him. (See 23 Fed. Rep. 134; 59 Ind. 268; 3 Col. 184; 55 Ill. 140. Benjamin on sales, sec. 382.)
The judgment will be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Ohio C.C. 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-express-co-v-mcdonough-ohiocirct-1892.