Adams Express Co. v. McDonough

3 Ohio Cir. Dec. 574
Hamilton Circuit Court·Decided January 15, 1892·Published

Opinion

SMITH, J.

McDonough, the plaintiff below, at the request of Kearns, delivered to the Adams Express Co. in this city, two pieces of marble, to be duly transmitted by such company, C. O. D., to Kearns, at Mt. Sterling, Ky. Both were destroyed [575]*575while being so transported, and Kearns refused to receive or pay for them, and McDonough brought his action to recover the damages sustained by him, by the failure of the defendant to carry them safely.

Robert Ramsey, for plaintiff in error. Matthews & Cleveland, for defendant in error.

The only question presented is, whether he is entitled to maintain the action, The trial judge refused to charge the jury as requested by defendant’s counsel, that he was not. We think the action of the court was right. The title to the property did not pass to Kearns on the delivery to the carrier, but such title, and the jus disponendi, remained in McDonough until the goods should be received by Kearns from the carrier, and paid for by him. (See 23 Fed. Rep. 134; 59 Ind. 268; 3 Col. 184; 55 Ill. 140. Benjamin on Sales, sec. 382.)

The judgment will be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams Express Co. v. McDonough, 3 Ohio Cir. Dec. 574 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1892).

3 Ohio Cir. Dec. 574 (Adams Express Co. v. McDonough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Merchants' Union Express Co. v. Schier
55 Ill. 140 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1870)
United States Express Co. v. Keefer
59 Ind. 263 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1877)