Adams Express Co. v. Kentucky

206 U.S. 138, 27 S. Ct. 608, 51 L. Ed. 992, 1907 U.S. LEXIS 1148
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 13, 1907·No. 332·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Brewer

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case differs from the preceding in the fact that it was tried by the court without a jury. In all other respects.’it is *139 substantially the same. There was the same averment in the indictment; and more than that, there was an express stipulation made between counsel pending the trial in these words:

“It is further agreed at this point that the whiskey' about which Jhe witness testified was delivered by the Adams Express Company and received by it in its office in Cincinnati .in the usual course of business as a common carrier, and carried by it to' Barbourville, Kentucky, by the method commonly known.as C. O. D.”

There is nothing, therefore, to distinguish this case in principle from the preceding, and- the same judgment will be entered in this,as in that.

Mr. Justice Harlan dissented. See p. 141, post.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams Express Co. v. Kentucky, 206 U.S. 138, 27 S. Ct. 608, 51 L. Ed. 992, 1907 U.S. LEXIS 1148 (1907).

206 U.S. 138 (Adams Express Co. v. Kentucky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Nelson
310 N.W.2d 777 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1981)
United States v. Weiss
293 F. 992 (N.D. Illinois, 1923)
United States v. Drawdy
288 F. 567 (S.D. Florida, 1923)
Howard v. State
73 So. 559 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1916)
State v. J. W. Kelly & Co.
123 Tenn. 556 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1910)
State v. Rosenberger
111 S.W. 509 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1908)