Adams County v. Rider

218 N.W. 60, 205 Iowa 137
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided February 7, 1928·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Faville, J.

The appellant is the owner of a farm which is traversed by a highway running east and west. A creek flows in a general southerly direction through a portion of appellant’s land, and in so doing passes across said highway under a bridge. To the west of said creek a ditch has been constructed along the south side of said highway, the water in which flows to the east, and enters the creek near said bridge. The appellant constructed what is termed a “water gap” or dam across the thread of the stream, and also constructed a fence in such a manner that it is claimed it became an obstruction across the mouth of the ditch where it discharges into the creek. This action is brought- to require the appellant to remove said obstructions.

The accompanying plat will assist in a clearer understanding of the situation. ' ’

*138 11LtT7zCd3cKaVWrG8UQNOgJRcyaswi0EDtWaqhRtQsM2MZcnvODBgf1mhWX8nVMDJAGkvbDHhyb505L

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams County v. Rider, 218 N.W. 60, 205 Iowa 137 (iowa 1928).

218 N.W. 60 (Adams County v. Rider) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herman v. Drew
249 N.W. 277 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1933)