Adams & Co. v. Wessel, Duval & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Adams & Co. v. Wessel, Duval & Co.

130 S.E. 365, 34 Ga. App. 487, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 335

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 10, 1925

Docket16640

StatusPublished

This text of 130 S.E. 365 (Adams & Co. v. Wessel, Duval & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams & Co. v. Wessel, Duval & Co., 130 S.E. 365, 34 Ga. App. 487, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 335 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The bill of exceptions containing no assignment of error either upon the exceptions pendente lite or upon the judgment complained of therein, the exceptions pendente lite, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, can not be considered.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial shows cause for a reversal of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Norman & Norman, for plaintiffs in error. W. A. Slaton, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The bill of exceptions containing no assignment of error either upon the exceptions pendente lite or upon the judgment complained of therein, the exceptions pendente lite, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, can not be considered.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial shows cause for a reversal of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Norman & Norman, for plaintiffs in error. W. A. Slaton, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 S.E. 365, 34 Ga. App. 487, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-co-v-wessel-duval-co-gactapp-1925.