ADAMS-CATES COMPANY v. Marler
This text of 217 S.E.2d 398 (ADAMS-CATES COMPANY v. Marler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order denying partial summary judgment to plaintiffs-appellants with respect to a portion of the relief sought by defendants in their "Third Defense and Counterclaim.” The trial court ruled: "After considering the matter the court concludes that there are genuine issues as to material facts on the matters involved in this motion and accordingly, the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment is overruled and denied. There is no enumerated error upon the court’s conclusion that genuine issues as to material facts remain for determination.
"We cannot escape the holding of the trial judge that material issues of fact remain to be determined, and since there is no enumerated error contesting this legal conclusion contained in the judgment, the denial of appellant’s motion for summary judgment must be affirmed.” Weaver v. Whaley, 233 Ga. 635, 636 (212 SE2d 812). We are bound by this ruling and have no alternative but to apply it here.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 S.E.2d 398, 135 Ga. App. 298, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-cates-company-v-marler-gactapp-1975.