Adamo v. P. G. Motor Freight, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Adamo v. P. G. Motor Freight, Inc.

4 A.D.2d 758, 164 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4809

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 8, 1957

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 4 A.D.2d 758 (Adamo v. P. G. Motor Freight, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adamo v. P. G. Motor Freight, Inc., 4 A.D.2d 758, 164 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries based on negligence and section 1848 of the Penal Law, the appeal is from an order dismissing the complaint as against defendants Village of Mamaroneok and Thomas Eton. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. In our opinion, the cause of action in neglience is sufficient on its face (Court of Claims Act, § 8; Bernardine v. City of New York, 294 N. Y. 361; Holmes v. County of Erie, 266 App. Div. 220, affd. 291 N. Y. 798; Joy v. City of Jamestown, 207 Mise. 873, affd. 286 App. Div. 991; Lee v. Village of Sandy Hill, 40 N. Y. 442; Be Wald v. Seidenberg, 297 N. Y. 335, 338). Hence, even if the cause of action under section 1848 be insufficient, the motion to dismiss must be denied, since it was addressed to the complaint as a whole insofar as it affects the [759]*759moving defendants {Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co., 296 N. T. 79; Andrews v. 98 Montague, 282 App. Div. 1066). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [5 Misc 2d 196.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries based on negligence and section 1848 of the Penal Law, the appeal is from an order dismissing the complaint as against defendants Village of Mamaroneok and Thomas Eton. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. In our opinion, the cause of action in neglience is sufficient on its face (Court of Claims Act, § 8; Bernardine v. City of New York, 294 N. Y. 361; Holmes v. County of Erie, 266 App. Div. 220, affd. 291 N. Y. 798; Joy v. City of Jamestown, 207 Mise. 873, affd. 286 App. Div. 991; Lee v. Village of Sandy Hill, 40 N. Y. 442; Be Wald v. Seidenberg, 297 N. Y. 335, 338). Hence, even if the cause of action under section 1848 be insufficient, the motion to dismiss must be denied, since it was addressed to the complaint as a whole insofar as it affects the [759]*759moving defendants {Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co., 296 N. T. 79; Andrews v. 98 Montague, 282 App. Div. 1066). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [5 Misc 2d 196.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.2d 758, 164 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adamo-v-p-g-motor-freight-inc-nyappdiv-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack