Adamo v. Department of Defense

178 F. App'x 3

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 30, 2006·No. No. 2006-3184·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Order Vacated, See 2006 WL 1072069.

[4]*4The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adamo v. Department of Defense, 178 F. App'x 3 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

Pincite

178 F. App'x 3 (Adamo v. Department of Defense) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.