Adamec v. Adamec

81 A.D.2d 600, 437 N.Y.S.2d 722, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11082
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 13, 1981·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

— In an action for divorce, the plaintiff husband appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 11, 1980, as (1) directed him to pay (a) $200 per week as temporary alimony, (b) $100 per week as temporary child support, and (c) the maintenance expenses of the marital home, including taxes, insurance, mortgage and amortization, fuel, gas, electric, water and basic telephone; and (2) awarded the defendant wife (a) temporary custody of the parties’ 19-year-old son and (b) exclusive possession of the marital home. Order modified, on the law, by deleting that portion which awards temporary custody of the parties’ 19-year-old son to defendant, and substituting a provision denying defendant’s application for temporary custody. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Appellant’s application, inter alia, to strike respondent’s brief denied. The parties’ 19-year-old son, having attained the age of majority, can no longer be the subject of a custody order (see Domestic Relations Law, § 2; Markland v Markland, 67 AD2d 940, mod on other grounds 48 NY2d 851; Silverman v Silverman, 50 AD2d 824). Under the circumstances of this case, and noting that the trial is set for April 20, 1981, we direct that the parties proceed to trial at said time subject to the approval of the Justice there presiding. We have considered plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Lazer, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adamec v. Adamec, 81 A.D.2d 600, 437 N.Y.S.2d 722, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11082 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

81 A.D.2d 600 (Adamec v. Adamec) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Belsky v. Belsky
172 A.D.2d 576 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Berk v. Berk
170 A.D.2d 564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Polito v. Polito
168 A.D.2d 440 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Pizzuto v. Pizzuto
162 A.D.2d 443 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Reich v. Reich
149 A.D.2d 676 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Lentz v. Lentz
117 Misc. 2d 78 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)