Adamasu v. Gifford, Krass, Groh, Sprinkle, Anderson & Citkowski
769 N.W.2d 228, 482 Mich. 1074, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 2270
This text of 769 N.W.2d 228 (Adamasu v. Gifford, Krass, Groh, Sprinkle, Anderson & Citkowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Adamasu v. Gifford, Krass, Groh, Sprinkle, Anderson & Citkowski, 769 N.W.2d 228, 482 Mich. 1074, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 2270 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
Gebre ADAMASU, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ANDERSON & CITKOWSKI, P.C., and Ellen S. Cogen, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 15, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
769 N.W.2d 228, 482 Mich. 1074, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 2270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adamasu-v-gifford-krass-groh-sprinkle-anderson-cit-mich-2008.