Adamasu v. Gifford, Krass, Groh, Sprinkle, Anderson & Citkowski
769 N.W.2d 228, 482 Mich. 1074, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 2270
Opinion
Gebre ADAMASU, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ANDERSON & CITKOWSKI, P.C., and Ellen S. Cogen, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 15, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adamasu v. Gifford, Krass, Groh, Sprinkle, Anderson & Citkowski, 769 N.W.2d 228, 482 Mich. 1074, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 2270 (Mich. 2008).
769 N.W.2d 228 (Adamasu v. Gifford, Krass, Groh, Sprinkle, Anderson & Citkowski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.