Adamar of New Jersey v. Director, Division of Taxation

768 A.2d 1054, 167 N.J. 67, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 334
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 3, 2001·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We modify and affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division concerning taxation of complimentary alcoholic beverages substantially for the reasons explained in Judge Braithwaite’s opinion, Adamar v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 328 N.J.Super. 481, 746 A.2d 474 (App.Div.2000), as supplemented by this Court’s opinion in GNOC v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 167 N.J. 62, 768 A.2d 1051 (2001), also filed today. We also affirm the Appellate Division’s determination to remand to the Tax Court for further proceedings the issue concerning taxation of non-alcoholic beverages.

[68]*68For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA and ZAZZALI — 7.

Opposed — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adamar of New Jersey v. Director, Division of Taxation, 768 A.2d 1054, 167 N.J. 67, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 334 (N.J. 2001).

768 A.2d 1054 (Adamar of New Jersey v. Director, Division of Taxation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adamar v. Director, Division of Taxation
746 A.2d 474 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2000)
GNOC, Corp. v. Director, Division of Taxation
768 A.2d 1051 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2001)