Adamar of New Jersey v. Director, Division of Taxation
Opinion
We modify and affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division concerning taxation of complimentary alcoholic beverages substantially for the reasons explained in Judge Braithwaite’s opinion, Adamar v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 328 N.J.Super. 481, 746 A.2d 474 (App.Div.2000), as supplemented by this Court’s opinion in GNOC v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 167 N.J. 62, 768 A.2d 1051 (2001), also filed today. We also affirm the Appellate Division’s determination to remand to the Tax Court for further proceedings the issue concerning taxation of non-alcoholic beverages.
[68]*68For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA and ZAZZALI — 7.
Opposed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
768 A.2d 1054 (Adamar of New Jersey v. Director, Division of Taxation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.