Adam Wisneski v. State
This text of Adam Wisneski v. State (Adam Wisneski v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice
Paul W. Green, Justice
Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 3, 2004
DISMISSED
The trial court's certification in this appeal states that this case "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." It further states "the defendant has waived the right of appeal." Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, "[t]he appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules." Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). On January 6, 2004, we ordered that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification showing that the appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record by February 5, 2004. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 177 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 2003, no pet.). No such amended trial court certification has been filed. Therefore, Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Adam Wisneski v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adam-wisneski-v-state-texapp-2004.