Adam v. Wells Fargo Bank

471 F. App'x 121
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 6, 2012
DocketNo. 11-1982
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 471 F. App'x 121 (Adam v. Wells Fargo Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adam v. Wells Fargo Bank, 471 F. App'x 121 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Abdou-Malik Yacoubou Adam seeks to appeal the district court’s orders granting in part and denying in part the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and denying his motion to expedite. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Adam seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yacoubou v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
901 F. Supp. 2d 623 (D. Maryland, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
471 F. App'x 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adam-v-wells-fargo-bank-ca4-2012.