Adam v. Vacquier

Third Circuit

Adam v. Vacquier

139 F.2d 347, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 2279

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedDecember 22, 1943

DocketNo. 8362

StatusPublished

This text of 139 F.2d 347 (Adam v. Vacquier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adam v. Vacquier, 139 F.2d 347, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 2279 (3d Cir. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A careful reading of the record in this case confirms us in the opinion that the question as to whether either or both of the defendants were guilty of negligence was fully and fairly tried and submitted, that the submission of the question as to whether the plaintiff guest of the third party defendant was free from fault did no legal harm of which either she or her co-plaintiff may now complain and that the jury’s verdict was a permissible finding from the evidence. The judgment of the District Court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A careful reading of the record in this case confirms us in the opinion that the question as to whether either or both of the defendants were guilty of negligence was fully and fairly tried and submitted, that the submission of the question as to whether the plaintiff guest of the third party defendant was free from fault did no legal harm of which either she or her co-plaintiff may now complain and that the jury’s verdict was a permissible finding from the evidence. The judgment of the District Court is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 F.2d 347, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 2279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adam-v-vacquier-ca3-1943.