Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Adam v. Solomon

Adam v. Solomon

289 A.D.2d 187, 733 N.Y.S.2d 915, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11974
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 3, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 289 A.D.2d 187 (Adam v. Solomon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adam v. Solomon, 289 A.D.2d 187, 733 N.Y.S.2d 915, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11974 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Arthur Solomon, Robert Solomon, and Evelyn Haies appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mason, J.), dated January 9, 2001, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary [188]*188judgment (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). Friedmann, J. P., Smith, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 A.D.2d 187, 733 N.Y.S.2d 915, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adam-v-solomon-nyappdiv-2001.