Adam v. Picciola Bros.
139 So. 727, 19 La. App. 83, 1932 La. App. LEXIS 258
This text of 139 So. 727 (Adam v. Picciola Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Adam v. Picciola Bros., 139 So. 727, 19 La. App. 83, 1932 La. App. LEXIS 258 (La. Ct. App. 1932).
Opinion
For the reasons given in the case of Alexander J. Sandrass and wife v. Picciola Brothers et al. (La. App.) 139 So. 725, the judgment rejecting plaintiff’s demand herein appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sandrass v. Picciola Bros.
139 So. 725 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1932)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
139 So. 727, 19 La. App. 83, 1932 La. App. LEXIS 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adam-v-picciola-bros-lactapp-1932.