Adam Sims v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

• Court: Indiana Court of Appeals
• Decided: August 20, 2020
• Docket: 19A-CR-2932
• Status: Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Aug 20 2020, 8:27 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Court of Appeals and Tax Court

estoppel, or the law of the case.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Mark D. Altenhof Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Elkhart, Indiana Attorney General of Indiana Megan M. Smith Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Adam Sims, August 20, 2020 Appellant-Defendant, Court of Appeals Case No. 19A-CR-2932 v. Appeal from the Elkhart Superior Court State of Indiana, The Honorable Kristine A. Osterday, Appellee-Plaintiff. Judge Trial Court Cause No. 20D01-1909-F5-216

Bailey, Judge.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-2932 | August 20, 2020 Page 1 of 3 [1] Adam Sims (“Sims”) was convicted of Domestic Battery, as a Level 5 felony.1

Pursuant to Indiana Code Section 35-38-1-7.7, the trial court determined that

Sims had committed a crime of domestic violence and it advised Sims of the

consequences of that determination. In its oral advisement, the court stated in

pertinent part as follows: “I will make a domestic violence determination which

for you means that you may not possess firearms, ammunition or deadly

weapons.” Tr. Vol. 2 at 181 (emphasis added). In its subsequent written order,

the court advised Sims that he “shall lose the right to possess a firearm” and

that “possession of a firearm or ammunition may constitute a separate crime[.]”

App. Vol. 2 at 171. The written order does not mention “deadly weapons.”

[2] Sims now appeals. He acknowledges that “sufficient evidence exists to sustain

a conviction[], the sentence [is] not inappropriate, and no real substantive or

procedural issues exist.” Br. of Appellant at 4 n.1. Moreover, Sims does not

dispute that he is prohibited from possessing a firearm and ammunition due to

the trial court’s determination that he had committed a crime of domestic

violence.2 Rather, the focus of the appeal is whether the trial court erred by

orally advising that Sims was prohibited from possessing deadly weapons. Sims

1 Ind. Code § 35-42-2-1.3(a)(1), (c)(4)(A) (2018). 2 In stating the issue and summarizing his argument, Sims asserts that the court erred by advising that he could not possess ammunition. However, Sims abandons this assertion in his argument section, focusing only on deadly weapons. We therefore do not address the propriety of ammunition-related advisements.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-2932 | August 20, 2020 Page 2 of 3 argues that the trial court misstated the consequences of its determination and

he asks that we remand so that the court “can properly advise him[.]” Id. at 7.

[3] The State agrees that the trial court orally misstated the law. According to the

State, the court’s “misstatement including deadly weapons as prohibited under

the domestic violence determination is harmless because that terminology was

not included in any of the trial court’s written orders.” Br. of Appellee at 8.

[4] Rather than remand or hold any error harmless, we elect to resolve the asserted

ambiguity. See Ind. Appellate Rule 66(C)(1) (permitting this Court to grant

“any . . . appropriate relief”). We hereby advise Sims that, although a court’s

domestic-violence determination results in a prohibition on possessing a

firearm, see, e.g., I.C. § 35-47-4-7(a)—and a firearm is included in the statutory

definition of “deadly weapon,” see I.C. § 35-31.5-2-86(a)(1)—the determination

does not result in a prohibition on possessing other deadly weapons. Therefore,

Sims is bound by the terms of the written order, which we affirm in all respects.

Vaidik, J., and Baker, S.J., concur.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-2932 | August 20, 2020 Page 3 of 3