Adam Richards v. Ed Prieto
782 F.3d 417, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 4940, 2015 WL 1381862
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 26, 2015·No. 11-16255·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adam Richards v. Ed Prieto, 782 F.3d 417, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 4940, 2015 WL 1381862 (9th Cir. 2015).
782 F.3d 417 (Adam Richards v. Ed Prieto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edward Peruta v. County of San Diego
824 F.3d 919 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)