Adam Piaquadio v. American Legal Funding

517 F. App'x 527
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 11, 2013
Docket12-1952
StatusUnpublished

This text of 517 F. App'x 527 (Adam Piaquadio v. American Legal Funding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adam Piaquadio v. American Legal Funding, 517 F. App'x 527 (8th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

American Legal Funding, LLC, and Al-fund AZI, LLC, appeal from the order of the District Court 1 denying their motion to set aside the default judgment entered against them. After careful review of the record, we conclude that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See Feeney v. AT & E, Inc., 472 F.3d 560, 563-64 (8th Cir.2006) (holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to set aside a default judgment, notwithstanding the district court’s “truncated” analysis, and noting that the most important factor in the analysis is the “reason for delay”). We also grant Adam Piaquadio’s motion to strike the portions of appellants’ reply brief that raise arguments not raised in their opening brief. See Federal Trade Comm’n v. Neiswonger, 580 F.3d 769, 775 (8th Cir.2009).

We affirm.

1

. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Federal Trade Commission v. Neiswonger
580 F.3d 769 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)
Feeney v. AT & E, Inc.
472 F.3d 560 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
517 F. App'x 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adam-piaquadio-v-american-legal-funding-ca8-2013.