Adam Funk v. State
This text of Adam Funk v. State (Adam Funk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,__________________ October 30, 2012
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A13I0066. ADAM FUNK v. THE STATE.
Adam Funk filed this application for interlocutory appeal from the superior court’s order denying his Plea in Abatement based upon OCGA § 17-7-53.1. Such an order is directly appealable. Langlands v. State, 282 Ga. 103, 104 (1) (646 SE2d 253) (2007) (“order overruling a plea in bar based on . . . OCGA § 17-7-53.1 is directly appealable”). This Court will grant a timely application for interlocutory appeal if the order is subject to direct appeal and the applicant has not otherwise filed a timely notice of appeal. Spivey v. Hembree, 268 Ga. App. 485, 486 n. 1 (602 SE2d 246) (2004). It appears that Funk has not filed a notice of appeal; therefore, the application is hereby GRANTED. Funk shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal in the superior court. The clerk of the superior court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to this Court.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 10/30/2012 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Adam Funk v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adam-funk-v-state-gactapp-2012.