Adam E. Salazar v. Roberto D. Ross, M.D.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 8, 2011·No. 04-10-00856-CV·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00856-CV

Adam E. SALAZAR, Appellant

v.

Roberto D. ROSS, M.D., Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2007-CI-02712 Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 8, 2011

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant’s brief, which was due on April 25, 2011, has not been filed. On May 6, 2011,

this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing by May 23, 2011, why this appeal should

not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant did not respond. The appeal is dismissed

for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Costs of appeal are taxed

against appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adam E. Salazar v. Roberto D. Ross, M.D., (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Adam E. Salazar v. Roberto D. Ross, M.D. (Adam E. Salazar v. Roberto D. Ross, M.D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.