Adam E. Salazar v. Roberto D. Ross, M.D.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00856-CV
Adam E. SALAZAR, Appellant
v.
Roberto D. ROSS, M.D., Appellee
From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2007-CI-02712 Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 8, 2011
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
Appellant’s brief, which was due on April 25, 2011, has not been filed. On May 6, 2011,
this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing by May 23, 2011, why this appeal should
not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant did not respond. The appeal is dismissed
for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Costs of appeal are taxed
against appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adam E. Salazar v. Roberto D. Ross, M.D. (Adam E. Salazar v. Roberto D. Ross, M.D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.