Adam Canales, Jr. v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)·Decided July 10, 2026·No. 07-25-00261-CR·Published

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-25-00261-CR

ADAM CANALES, JR., APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 137th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. DC-2022-CR-0239, Honorable John J. “Trey” McClendon III, Presiding

July 10, 2026 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before DOSS and YARBROUGH and PRATT, JJ.

Appellant, Adam Canales, Jr., appeals his conviction for manslaughter1 and

sentence to twenty years of confinement. Appellant’s brief was originally due February

2, 2026, but we granted Appellant’s appointed counsel three extensions to file a brief due

to counsel’s caseload. By letter of April 20, 2026, we admonished Appellant’s counsel

that no further extensions would be granted and that failure to file a brief by May 4, 2026,

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE § 19.04. would result in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for

further proceedings without further notice. To date, Appellant’s counsel has neither filed

a brief nor had any further communication with this Court.

Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further

proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall

determine the following:

1. whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;

2. whether Appellant is indigent;

3. if Appellant is not indigent, whether Appellant has made the necessary

arrangements for filing a brief;

4. why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on behalf of Appellant;

5. whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;

6. whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel;

7. whether new counsel should be appointed; and

8. if Appellant desires to continue the appeal, the date the Court may expect

Appellant’s brief to be filed.

The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a

supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by August 10, 2026.

If it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has 2 been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint new counsel;

the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any newly

appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.

Should Appellant’s counsel file a brief on or before the date the trial court acts per

our directive, he shall immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon

the trial court shall not be required to take any further action.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adam Canales, Jr. v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Adam Canales, Jr. v. the State of Texas (Adam Canales, Jr. v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.