Adam Bair v. Baller Alert, Inc.
This text of Adam Bair v. Baller Alert, Inc. (Adam Bair v. Baller Alert, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed December 17, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-0941 Lower Tribunal No. 24-14757-CA-01 ________________
Adam Bair, Appellant,
vs.
Baller Alert, Inc., Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David C. Miller and Jason Emilios Dimitris, Judges.
Adam Bair in proper person.
Wolfe Law Miami, P.A., and Richard C. Wolfe and Nick Medina, for appellee.
Before SCALES, C.J., and GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Readon v. WPLG LLC, 317 So. 3d 1229, 1234–35 (Fla.
3d DCA 2021) (“Under the substantial truth doctrine, a statement does not
have to be perfectly accurate if the gist or the sting of the statement is true.
As long as a report is substantially correct, it is not necessary that it be exact
in every immaterial detail or that it conform to the precision demanded in
technical or scientific reporting.”) (internal quotation marks and citations
omitted).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Adam Bair v. Baller Alert, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adam-bair-v-baller-alert-inc-fladistctapp-2025.