Adam Ayala v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 26, 2014·No. 04-13-00705-CR·Published

Opinion

The State

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 26, 2014

No. 04-13-00705-CR

Adam AYALA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR1053 Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Appellant Adam Ayala has filed a pro se “Motion to Addendum to Briefs Set for Viewing on the 4th day of June 2014.” Appellant has a court-appointed attorney who has filed a brief on his behalf. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). Therefore, appellant’s pro se motion is DENIED.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adam Ayala v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Adam Ayala v. State (Adam Ayala v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patrick v. State
906 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Robinson v. State
240 S.W.3d 919 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)